The American People and Irresolute Resolutions- Updated

Listening to many members of the House and Senate, especially on the Democratic side, the “American People” overwhelmingly want this travesty of political gamesmanship and avoiding of responsibility in the form of a resolution against the surge passed. My own reasons against that have been stated, and I give them to you again, and it is non-partisan. If you are opposed to the war you should oppose the resolution, if you are in favor of continuing our efforts in Iraq you should oppose these resolutions.

An Open Letter To Our Senators: The difference between opposing and undermining

The Politics of Destructive Ineffectualism

More on Destructive Ineffectualism

What Are We Arguing Over? The Warner-Levin Amendment

It seems in looking at this the American people may have all kinds of negative opinions about the war (though they are not as simple, or as beneficial to their careers as many critics might like to think) the prospects for a positive outcome or even the surge itself. Those views however, for a variety of reasons, have not convinced a significant majority, or even a plurality of Americans, that this resolution is a good idea.

According to the latest CBS poll (pdf.) the view of the President and his plan is far more complex than it is often portrayed. For example:

SHOULD U.S. SEND 20,000 MORE TROOPS TO IRAQ?
——————–| Now |—-| 1/2007 |———–
Favor ———–| 33% |—-| 29% |————-
Oppose ———| 63% |—-| 66%|————–

This is the number that proponents of this measure focus on. However compare that to this number:

NON-BINDING RESOLUTION AGAINST SENDING MORE TROOPS TO IRAQ
——————————————-| All |—| Dems |—| Reps |—| Inds |——
Congress should pass ——-|44%|—| 57% |—| 26% |—| 47% |——
Congress should not pass -|45%|—| 29% |—| 65% |—| 43% |——

Of course the reasons for opposing the resolution do not have to imply support for it or the President, and the numbers in the poll show that. However, imagining it implies that they want the congress to do even more to end this war runs up against this:

HOW LONG SHOULD THE TROOP INCREASE BE GIVEN TO SUCCEED?

Less than three months ——| 13%
Three to six months ———–| 29%
Six months or more ———–| 53%

So most think the president’s plan should be given at least six months to see if it is successful. This and the number above hardly imply overwhelming conviction on the part of the public to pass this resolution. I suspect the reason is that many are opposed to the surge for what might be called hawkish reasons as well as many who feel it is unwise but not strongly so and believe it should be given a chance despite their misgivings.

I also suggest looking at this, which goes to show that opposing the war is hardly a slam dunk winner politically:

IN 2008, WILL YOU ONLY CONSIDER A PRES. CANDIDATE WHO…
(Among Primary voters)
———————————-| All |—| Rep. Primary |—| Dem. Primary |—
Supports the war ——| 9% |————| 20% |————| 2% |——-
Opposes the war ——–| 15% |————| 5% |————| 25% |—–
It depends —————–| 75% |————| 73% |————| 73% |—–

IN YOUR 2008 PRESIDENTIAL VOTE, IRAQ ISSUE WILL BE:
(Among registered voters)
————————————————-| All |—| Reps |—| Dems |—| Indeps |—
Most important issue ————| 14% |—| 12% |—| 16% |—| 13% |—
Important, along
with other issues ——————| 73% |—| 71% |—| 74% |—| 73% |—
Won’t influence vote ————| 13% |—| 17% |—| 10% |—| 12% |—

The main conclusion is that there is not a huge groundswell of support for this measure. So listen to the American public guys, punt or do something which takes real courage one way or the other.

Update: McQ analyzes the political wrangling in the House. It is pretty much mine and fits with what I have been arguing about the politics behind this, and this poll backs it up. Billy Hollis also points out what this poll shows and I argue in The Politics of Destructive Ineffectualism linked above. However Iraq turns out, it doesn’t mean that it bodes well for the anti-war camp down the road. In fact, I think it works out worse if it doesn’t go well.

More: McQ is on a roll, he compares the CBS and USA Today’s polls.
Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

powered by performancing firefox

About Lance

I want to thank everybody who has encouraged me over the past few years to do this. I doubt it will hold but a few people's interest, but that is okay with me. Special thanks go to Peter over at http://www.liberalcapitalist.com. I value my privacy a great deal, so I will guess you will have to get to know me over time to find out much. I am in the financial services, wealth management, investing or whatever you want to call it business. I have children, my oldest is entering college. I have no great or imposing academic background, my grades varied from high enough to get invited to an honors program at my university to frustrating enough to cause my father great grief. My major was history, with a minor in ethics. My main interest towards the end was in the history of economic ideas before life took a turn and I ended up never going on to graduate school. However, I have a fair knowledge of history, economics, investing and would probably be considered well read. My tastes are eclectic and I pretty much find the entire world interesting. I have an enduring interest in how people learn about and analyze the world; my posts here will examine this topic in detail over time. I make no claims to be above the very biases and errors I see in others, in fact it is my belief that we are incapable of escaping them, only moderating their control over us. I am a member of no political party, but I would broadly consider myself a man of the right. I am inclined to free market economics, limited government and a fairly narrow view of the role of the state. A small L libertarian if you will. However, if you are looking for broad based "the left believes..." or "wingers are so...." types of attacks on liberals, conservatives, neo-cons or whatever enemy you want to slam, look elsewhere. Lance
This entry was posted in Domestic Politics, Foreign affairs, Lance's Page, Media. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The American People and Irresolute Resolutions- Updated

  1. Pingback: A Second Hand Conjecture » The Great Sock Puppet doesn’t like Brit Hume, but loves Murtha

  2. Acai X3 Scam says:

    It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>