The Wright Stuff

I haven’t had much time to grace the pages of ASHC lately, but I was skimming through Memeorandum and just couldn’t resist saying something about this little screed:

Wright issue will haunt conservative media elite

By Roland S. Martin
CNN Contributor

Now that Sen. Barack Obama has denounced his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, many of his critics, especially those who call themselves conservative, are happy he has put the dashiki-wearing, American-criticizing former Marine in his place.

See, these same voices, many that are allegedly Christian, have reacted with glee by calling Wright a prophet of hate and a race baiter.

They hold themselves up to be so concerned about their fellow brother and sister, yet if you looked at their personal lives, I doubt you’d find many with African-American friends and associates (and I doubt their staffs are the most diverse in the world, but that’s another story).

But be careful what you ask for.

Martin goes on in this vein for the entire spleen-spewing piece, and basically warns conservatives that because they “gleefully” targeted Obama’s association with his (now former) pastor, they should expect the exact same treatment from liberals.

Because the article is so target-rich with fiskable material it’s difficult to say just which bit is more absurd than another, but Martin’s good-for-the-gander warning is no doubt top five. Particularly since it completely ignores the fact that Hillary Clinton pushed this issue as much as any “conservative,” that Obama’s mercurial explanations for his choice of pastor created much fodder for the press (and wasn’t well received by the voters), and that kept the problem front and center. It also ignores the fact that liberals have been caterwauling about people like Hagee since McCain accepted his endorsement. In fact, Martin’s attempt to head his critics off at the pass completely undermines his point by tacitly acknowledging that liberals have already tried to tie the Hagee albatross around McCain’s neck:

Now that Wright has set the so-called standard for what isn’t acceptable for religious leaders, let’s see these same critics take their own kind to task for making absolutely outlandish comments.

But don’t stop there. Demand that candidates don’t seek counsel from them. Demand that Republican candidates not go to their churches and sit in their pews and accept their contributions. And if elected, make sure those same candidates don’t allow them access to the White House or halls of Congress. Turnabout is fair play, and that means guys like the Revs. Pat Robertson and John Hagee should not be sought out for their endorsements, and should be removed from any committees associated with a candidate or a political party.

Oh, I can’t wait to get the e-mails from folks who will say, “Yeah, but Obama was a member of the church.”

True, very true.

But if the marker is now saying anything unacceptable to the masses, then that should be the standard for any pastor: white, black, male, female, conservative or liberal. And any candidate, member or not.

I’ve read many of the columns and listened to the shows of these so-called conservative patriots, and few, if any, have said a word about conservative white pastors who have called for the overthrow of the government for not following Christian values (the late Francis Schaeffer, a little “g” God on the Religious Right), or who have called for the destruction of the Islamic religion of a number of Americans (Pastor Rod Parsley) and folks worldwide.

Martin’s analogy makes no sense, of course, which is why he simply waves his hand at the fact that Wright was Obama’s pastor for twenty-some years. That’s an inconvenient fact for his rant, so it’s mentioned without being addressed, and instead he tries to turn it into a racial issue. Martin is trying to set up the meme that Rev. Wright became an issue not because of his racist and anti-American utterings, but because he’s black. The problem, however, is that picking up an endorsement from a crazy, anti-Catholic preacher is just not the same as sitting in the church of a crazy, anti-American, white-hating, marxist-loving, Farrakhan-embracing preacher for over twenty years, not to mention personally choosing him as your spiritual mentor. The former says something about the state of politics for sure in that a candidate is essentially required to pick up such an endorsement in order to get the job. The latter says something about the candidate’s judgment and choice of company and nothing about the state of politics in general (although, I believe it does say something about being in politics in Chicago).

What’s really laughable about Martin’s, however, is his closing warning:

But to every politician, whether you are a Democrat or a Republican: Beware. The die has been cast. The repeated denunciations of Wright will now lead each and every single one of you to have your pastors’ oral and written words examined. If even one thing is said that can be construed as criticizing America or deemed hateful, then expect to see it on YouTube and replayed for millions to see. I suggest you go to your pastor now and say, “Please, watch what you say. I don’t want to have to denounce you on national television.”

To my media pals who are part of the conservative media elite, we’ll be watching. And listening. Let’s just see if you’re as willing to tear apart one of your own.

That’s like warning the seals that the sharks are out to get them. But Martin is a journalist so I guess something that’s been happening all along seems like news to him.

UPDATE: QandO links (thanks, McQ!) and in addition to displaying the many spelling errors in my post (now fixed) adds this admonition:

Watch for variations on this [racial] theme to continue to emerge from the left as the right continues to hammer the Wright/Obama connection.

McQ’s right that Obama backers will push this meme when convenient simply because of the general fear that people hold of being called a racist. On the one hand, it’s good that it has become so socially unacceptable to be a bigot, but on the other it is a shame how some people broadly employ the epithet, without regard for the consequences, simply to score cheap political points. In any case, expect the cry of racism to emerge whenever Wright is mentioned in the context of Obama’s lack of judgment.

Sphere: Related Content

6 Responses to “The Wright Stuff”

  1. on 06 May 2008 at 8:16 pm Don

    Wright may be the worst single aspect, but Ayers, Obama’s commie blogger, Mrs. Obama, and Mr. Obama’s handling of all the former create a type of synergy.

  2. on 07 May 2008 at 1:52 am Robby

    I don’t know anything (or at least not any more than anyone else does) about what’s going to happen come November, but barring a complete McCain meltdown, I cannot imagine Obama winning the presidency with this kind of baggage. As I have no allegiance to the either party, my vote is at least notionally up for grabs, but the Democrats keep nominating these embarrassingly bad candidates.
     
     
     
     

  3. on 07 May 2008 at 6:14 am Keith_Indy

    The big problem with this theory is that talk radio is very critical of McCain, and is more then willing to take on any member of the religious right when they say something stupid or outlandish.

    Of course, he would have had to been listening to talk radio in order to know that.

  4. on 07 May 2008 at 9:49 am PogueMahone

    UPDATE: QandO links (thanks, McQ!)
     
    In the 30+ blog posts about Wright over at QandO, the comments section is littered with accusations of racism on Obama’s part. Despite that there is no evidence – in written or spoken word – that Obama’s views are anywhere close to Wright’s, there doesn’t seem to be any hesitation among some to hurl “racist” at Obama.
     
    So wouldn’t you say that the Right is guilty as well when it comes to,
     
    but on the other it is a shame how some people broadly employ the epithet, without regard for the consequences, simply to score cheap political points.
     
    ???
     
    Well I think you might say that if someone asked you.

  5. on 07 May 2008 at 10:29 am Keith_Indy

    Well, I only know about what Hannity was ranting about.

    His major complaint was that it showed a lack of judgment to be associated with Wright for 20 years.  Then to stand up for him, only to repudiate him later, shows an even greater lack of judgment.

  6. on 07 May 2008 at 1:33 pm Achillea

    “Despite that there is no evidence – in written or spoken word – that Obama’s views are anywhere close to Wright’s …”
    Actions (such as Obama’s attending that ‘church’ for the better part of two decades, naming Wright his spiritual adviser, taking his children to be preached that spew, etc., etc.) speak far louder than words, even when not dealing with politicians — a species that lies as easily as it breathes.
     

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply