<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; morality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/tag/morality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What passes for moral clarity</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2009/03/10/what-passes-for-moral-clarity/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2009/03/10/what-passes-for-moral-clarity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synova's Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=6862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creating a human embryo for the purpose of experimentation and destruction = Good. Creating a  human embryo for the purpose of creating a born human person = Bad. How does it work that way? Also, some argue that Obama&#8217;s statements &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2009/03/10/what-passes-for-moral-clarity/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2009/03/10/what-passes-for-moral-clarity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morality of the Bailout</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/11/18/morality-of-the-bailout/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/11/18/morality-of-the-bailout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dinesh D'Souza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Economic Stabilization Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of the Pacific]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=6306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a Q&#38;A session at the University of the Pacific in October, Dinesh D&#8217;Souza was asked about the moral dimensions of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act. I don&#8217;t agree entirely with the causality he posits exists between irresponsible consumer behavior &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/11/18/morality-of-the-bailout/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/11/18/morality-of-the-bailout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oral Nonsex</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/11/05/oral-nonsex/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/11/05/oral-nonsex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee's Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adultery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analingus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blowjob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cunnilingus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fellatio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irreligious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monica Lewinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montrose High School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral nonsex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thesaurus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=6045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recall it being reported at the height of the sordid and tedious Monica Lewinsky scandal, that Bill Clinton personally felt he had not violated his wedding vows because in his view, receiving fellatio did not constitute adultery. Evidently Clinton &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/11/05/oral-nonsex/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/11/05/oral-nonsex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mixed Economies: Efficacy Without Moral Narrative</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/09/09/mixed-economies-efficacy-without-moral-narrative/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/09/09/mixed-economies-efficacy-without-moral-narrative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee's Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anglo-Saxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis Fukuyama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukuyama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixed economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NextLeft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunder Katwala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Way]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=5424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(photo: Ian Murchison &#124; website) The nationalization of Fannie &#38; Freddie is often presented as a crisis of faith for the political right, due to its manifest incompatibility with the advertised belief in the &#8220;free market.&#8221; However, Sunder Katwala at &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/09/09/mixed-economies-efficacy-without-moral-narrative/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/09/09/mixed-economies-efficacy-without-moral-narrative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

