<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; courts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/tag/courts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Libertarian Party Irony</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/08/20/libertarian-party-irony/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/08/20/libertarian-party-irony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MikeR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/08/20/libertarian-party-irony/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right Wing News&#8220;So the Libertarians think that the federal courts should tell a private church and pastor whom they can invite to a political discussion.&#8221;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/08/20/libertarian-party-irony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Because Who Really Needs Evidence Anyway?</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/06/21/because-who-really-needs-evidence-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/06/21/because-who-really-needs-evidence-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Foust</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=3001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unbelievable: The Motion Picture Association of America said Friday intellectual-property holders should have the right to collect damages, perhaps as much as $150,000 per copyright violation, without having to prove infringement. &#8220;Mandating such proof could thus have the pernicious effect &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/06/21/because-who-really-needs-evidence-anyway/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/06/21/because-who-really-needs-evidence-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Against Sharia</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/13/against-sharia/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/13/against-sharia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ali Etraz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ali Eteraz takes a lengthy, sober and sympathetic look at the various arguments for granting jurisdiction to Sharia courts over Muslims in UK law. He rejects them all to good effect.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/13/against-sharia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

