<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/tag/constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A New Age of Female Masturbation</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/12/10/a-new-age-of-female-masturbation/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/12/10/a-new-age-of-female-masturbation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheeseburgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian feminist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lily Tomlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masturbation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-restraint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=6455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lesbian feminist Lily Tomlin once joked that the only reason cretinous men walked upright was to free their hands for masturbation. Fair enough, but the posture of the lady might soon lack for any better purpose. According to a new &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/12/10/a-new-age-of-female-masturbation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/12/10/a-new-age-of-female-masturbation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama on Firearms</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/06/14/obama-on-firearms/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/06/14/obama-on-firearms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covertress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Covertress gives us 21 reasons why gun owners might be justifiably doubtful (and not a little alarmed) about Barack Obama&#8217;s commitment to their constitutional right.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/06/14/obama-on-firearms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perverse Consequences</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/29/perverse-consequences/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/29/perverse-consequences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MichaelW</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MichaelW's Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["anchor babies"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural-born citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panama Canal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does it strike anyone else as tragically ironic that, if indeed John McCain were declared not to be a &#8220;natural-born citizen&#8221; due to the locus of his birth, then an &#8220;anchor baby&#8221; could be elected President but the child of &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/29/perverse-consequences/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/29/perverse-consequences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citizen McCain</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/28/citizen-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/28/citizen-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MichaelW</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MichaelW's Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural-born citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panama Canal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE LATEST non-issue hyped by (who else?) the New York Times is that &#8220;some&#8221; people are questioning whether or not John McCain is eligible to be a sitting President: The question has nagged at the parents of Americans born outside &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/28/citizen-mccain/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/28/citizen-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Conservative Enough?</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/04/not-conservative-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/04/not-conservative-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peg's Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barak Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Cinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many Republicans and/or conservatives have been wailing that McCain is not conservative enough for them. No links; loads abound. &#160; The people who complain about this are correct &#8211; at least on some topics, IMHO. But, if you don&#8217;t want &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/04/not-conservative-enough/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/04/not-conservative-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huckabee&#8217;s New Constitutional Order</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/19/huckabees-new-constitutional-order/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/19/huckabees-new-constitutional-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judical pragmatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theocrat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Add another unsettling dimension to Mike Huckabee&#8217;s rather bizarre views on the Constitution: he apparently subscribes to the judicial pragmatist interpretation of a Living Constitution. Imagine the notion of an open constitution into which you can read any unwritten right, &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/19/huckabees-new-constitutional-order/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/19/huckabees-new-constitutional-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Huckabee&#8217;s First Act in Office?</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/16/mike-huckabees-first-act-in-office/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/16/mike-huckabees-first-act-in-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theocracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at some possible constitutional changes Huckabee would make if he becomes president. Heh.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/16/mike-huckabees-first-act-in-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>God&#8217;s Own Constitution</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/16/gods-own-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/16/gods-own-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Around the Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video clip of Mike Huckabee arguing that &#8220;what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it’s in God’s standards.&#8221; Hmm. Is that really in accord with anyone&#8217;s notion of Founders intent? I know committed social conservatives who &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/16/gods-own-constitution/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/16/gods-own-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

