<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; Eugenics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/category/eugenics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What passes for moral clarity</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2009/03/10/what-passes-for-moral-clarity/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2009/03/10/what-passes-for-moral-clarity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synova's Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=6862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creating a human embryo for the purpose of experimentation and destruction = Good. Creating a  human embryo for the purpose of creating a born human person = Bad. How does it work that way? Also, some argue that Obama&#8217;s statements &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2009/03/10/what-passes-for-moral-clarity/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2009/03/10/what-passes-for-moral-clarity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Intentions; Frightening Results</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/05/good-intentions-frightening-results/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/05/good-intentions-frightening-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peg's Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenlining Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holocaust Museum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; This morning, I read a column from the Wall Street Journal about race. Just when we thought we&#8217;d heard everything from the diversity police, here they come trying to prescribe even the color of charity. The California Assembly last &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/05/good-intentions-frightening-results/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/05/good-intentions-frightening-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better off Dead</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/02/better-off-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/02/better-off-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 00:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Synova</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synova's Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kim at Wizbang links to this story about eugenic thinking in Brittan. The comments came as the Lords debated an amendment, [...] that would have protected unborn disabled children from abortion after the 24 week gestational time limit. The amendment &#8230; <a href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/02/better-off-dead/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/02/better-off-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

