<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NATO is Toothless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/08/20/nato-is-toothlless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/08/20/nato-is-toothlless/</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/08/20/nato-is-toothlless/comment-page-1/#comment-225226</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/08/20/nato-is-toothlless/#comment-225226</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;despite pressure from the United States that NATO at
 least threaten Russia with unspecified “consequences,”&lt;/em&gt;

What would a totally empty threat accomplish other than escalate an already angry dog?

NATO as a whole, is a neutered puppy. So to antagonize things and make the room more problematic does nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;despite pressure from the United States that NATO at<br />
 least threaten Russia with unspecified “consequences,”</em></p>
<p>What would a totally empty threat accomplish other than escalate an already angry dog?</p>
<p>NATO as a whole, is a neutered puppy. So to antagonize things and make the room more problematic does nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

