Comments on: Jerome Corsi, 9/11 Denier

By: Lee

Lee — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:26:59 +0000

Chris, if you keep at this you’re going to talk them into giving up and going back to JFK conspiracies. You’re young enough to have missed most of that, but we had to put up with 38 years of boring crackpotism about it. The whole 9/11 denial thing may be even loonier, but at least it’s at least a change of subject. And changes of subject don’t come easily to these guys once they get started.

By: ChrisB

ChrisB — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:57:42 +0000

AE911 is a charade. None of these “hundreds of architects and engineers” as you call them have written any white papers or scholarly journals for peer review. The site presents nothing in the way of a unique argument, but just parrots long disproved talking points. Furthermore it’s full of electrical engineers and other professions that have no professional insight into the issue.

Perhaps most laughable is the obvious contradictions presented on the front page. It presents 2 different set of signs of “classic demolition” (to say nothing of none of the members having any expertise in demolitions) and it claims symmetrical “collapse” as a “classic characteristic” in building 7 (which it wasn’t) while also claiming “Lateral ejection of thousands of individual 4 – 20 ton steel beams up to 500 feet” is also a classic sign (and the amount of explosives necessary to launch the steel so far is in the range of thousands of tons).

By: onceproudamerican

onceproudamerican — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:10:26 +0000

I would love to believe the “official” conspiracy theory about 9/11 but I cannot rid my intellect of the 100 extra IQ points I have that get in the way.

I have no investment in any particular point of view as long as it doesn’t insult my intelligence. Get yourself an open mind and check-out http://www.AE911truth.org. These are hundreds of architects and engineers who are RISKING their reputations to help find the truth.

They make much more sense than the flawed 9/11 Commission report does! BTW the offical story is a conspiracy theory folks; you see when more than one person does something it is a conspiracy by definition.

My logic Professor in college taught me something that has served me well over the years: when you use an ad hominem attack it means that you cannot win a debate on the merits of your argument………..

By: ChrisB

ChrisB — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:20:10 +0000

ah bofors. shouldn't you be on jref trying to convince everyone that wtc1 should have bent over 45 degrees to allow the top part to fall off and then bounce back into place like a jack-in-the-box? or that the military is brainwashed?

By: Lee

Lee — Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:58:47 +0000

I removed your hyperlink Borfors, as our spam interceptor wasn’t allowing it for some reason.

By: bofors

bofors — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:03:24 +0000

Any idiot can figure out that explosives where used to destory the World Trade Center, just google “WTC 7″:

Stop posting lies about 9/11!