<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squirming Like A Stuck Pig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/04/16/squirming-like-a-stuck-pig/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/04/16/squirming-like-a-stuck-pig/</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/04/16/squirming-like-a-stuck-pig/comment-page-1/#comment-201246</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2816#comment-201246</guid>
		<description>I have to say, Josh. I really like your style in how to create propaganda posts that bolster your side of things while creatively poking holes in people and beliefs you want to bring down.

&lt;b&gt;Back-Stabbing Amongst the Warmongers

Joshua Foust on Apr 15 2008 at 2:15 pm &#124; Filed under: Around the Web, Notes on the war

Stephen Hayes, when even Doug Feith (who is renown for his honesty) won’t stand up for your articles on the Iraq-Al Qaeda connection, it might be time to admit you were wrong.&lt;/b&gt;

Was your last post.

&lt;b&gt;Technically, Doug Feith is right: no one ever said it would be a cakewalk. Of course, that still doesn’t mean he’s not a big, fat liar desperate to rewrite history with someone else as the villain.&lt;/b&gt;

Is your current line now.

It&#039;s kind of great how you weave that consistency and ambiguity around with Feith. Suggesting that he is either too honest to stand up for Hayes&#039; lies or not dishonest enough. Using your opponent&#039;s character flaws, ones which you have accused them of having, for your own benefit is great. Using your opponent&#039;s character traits and making them look like virtuous ones that also reinforce your views, is priceless.

Being able to ambiguously switch between using an opponent&#039;s dishonesty as both a virtue and a vice? Now that&#039;s the acme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, Josh. I really like your style in how to create propaganda posts that bolster your side of things while creatively poking holes in people and beliefs you want to bring down.</p>
<p><b>Back-Stabbing Amongst the Warmongers</p>
<p>Joshua Foust on Apr 15 2008 at 2:15 pm | Filed under: Around the Web, Notes on the war</p>
<p>Stephen Hayes, when even Doug Feith (who is renown for his honesty) won’t stand up for your articles on the Iraq-Al Qaeda connection, it might be time to admit you were wrong.</b></p>
<p>Was your last post.</p>
<p><b>Technically, Doug Feith is right: no one ever said it would be a cakewalk. Of course, that still doesn’t mean he’s not a big, fat liar desperate to rewrite history with someone else as the villain.</b></p>
<p>Is your current line now.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of great how you weave that consistency and ambiguity around with Feith. Suggesting that he is either too honest to stand up for Hayes&#8217; lies or not dishonest enough. Using your opponent&#8217;s character flaws, ones which you have accused them of having, for your own benefit is great. Using your opponent&#8217;s character traits and making them look like virtuous ones that also reinforce your views, is priceless.</p>
<p>Being able to ambiguously switch between using an opponent&#8217;s dishonesty as both a virtue and a vice? Now that&#8217;s the acme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/04/16/squirming-like-a-stuck-pig/comment-page-1/#comment-201245</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2816#comment-201245</guid>
		<description>Cheney&#039;s not a big fat liar, even though some people wish him to be one if only because they want to ignore Feith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheney&#8217;s not a big fat liar, even though some people wish him to be one if only because they want to ignore Feith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisB</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/04/16/squirming-like-a-stuck-pig/comment-page-1/#comment-201235</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2816#comment-201235</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So you&#039;re telling me people will misrepresent their political enemies words to make them look bad?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re telling me people will misrepresent their political enemies words to make them look bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/04/16/squirming-like-a-stuck-pig/comment-page-1/#comment-201055</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2816#comment-201055</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, that actually makes Cheney seem kind of prophetic Keith.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that actually makes Cheney seem kind of prophetic Keith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith_Indy</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/04/16/squirming-like-a-stuck-pig/comment-page-1/#comment-201051</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith_Indy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2816#comment-201051</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Man, they must have a problem with reading comprehension over there.  Looking at the first 4 quotes they selected, none of them say anything about the ease, duration, or cost of the war.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if you look at the fifth quote, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/17/ftn/main544228.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IN CONTEXT,&lt;/a&gt; you&#039;ll see a much more balanced statement of Cheney&#039;s thoughts.  In the end, the war against Saddam&#039;s regime, did last weeks, and not months, and it is the aftermath which has turned difficult.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SCHIEFFER: &lt;/strong&gt;If we do have to take action, do you think it will be a long war or a short war?     &lt;strong&gt;CHENEY: &lt;/strong&gt;My own judgment based on my time as secretary of Defense, and having operated in this area in the past, I&#039;m confident that our troops will be successful, and I think it&#039;ll go relatively quickly, but we can&#039;t...    &lt;strong&gt;SCHIEFFER: &lt;/strong&gt;Weeks?     &lt;strong&gt;CHENEY: &lt;/strong&gt;...we can&#039;t count on that.     &lt;strong&gt;SCHIEFFER: &lt;/strong&gt;Months?     &lt;strong&gt;CHENEY: &lt;/strong&gt;Weeks rather than months. &lt;strong&gt;There&#039;s always the possibility of complications that you can&#039;t anticipate, but I have great confidence in our troops.&lt;/strong&gt; The men and women who serve in our military today are superb. Our capabilities as a force are the finest the world has ever known.   They&#039;re very ably led by General Tommy Franks and Secretary Rumsfeld. And so I have great confidence in the conduct of the military campaign. &lt;strong&gt;The really challenging part of it to some extent may come in the aftermath once the military segment is over and we move to try and stand up a new government and turn over to the  Iraqi people the responsibilities to their nation.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, they must have a problem with reading comprehension over there.  Looking at the first 4 quotes they selected, none of them say anything about the ease, duration, or cost of the war.</p>
<p>And if you look at the fifth quote, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/17/ftn/main544228.shtml" rel="nofollow">IN CONTEXT,</a> you&#8217;ll see a much more balanced statement of Cheney&#8217;s thoughts.  In the end, the war against Saddam&#8217;s regime, did last weeks, and not months, and it is the aftermath which has turned difficult.</p>
<p><strong>SCHIEFFER: </strong>If we do have to take action, do you think it will be a long war or a short war?     <strong>CHENEY: </strong>My own judgment based on my time as secretary of Defense, and having operated in this area in the past, I&#8217;m confident that our troops will be successful, and I think it&#8217;ll go relatively quickly, but we can&#8217;t&#8230;    <strong>SCHIEFFER: </strong>Weeks?     <strong>CHENEY: </strong>&#8230;we can&#8217;t count on that.     <strong>SCHIEFFER: </strong>Months?     <strong>CHENEY: </strong>Weeks rather than months. <strong>There&#8217;s always the possibility of complications that you can&#8217;t anticipate, but I have great confidence in our troops.</strong> The men and women who serve in our military today are superb. Our capabilities as a force are the finest the world has ever known.   They&#8217;re very ably led by General Tommy Franks and Secretary Rumsfeld. And so I have great confidence in the conduct of the military campaign. <strong>The really challenging part of it to some extent may come in the aftermath once the military segment is over and we move to try and stand up a new government and turn over to the  Iraqi people the responsibilities to their nation.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

