<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Measuring Stability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-169012</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/#comment-169012</guid>
		<description>Joushua, what I&#039;m saying is that it IS WRONG, because it has absurd results. 

Not simply with respect to Iraq, A&#039;stan, etc., but in the major point that quite a few of the high ranking countries can&#039;t seriously provide for their security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joushua, what I&#8217;m saying is that it IS WRONG, because it has absurd results. </p>
<p>Not simply with respect to Iraq, A&#8217;stan, etc., but in the major point that quite a few of the high ranking countries can&#8217;t seriously provide for their security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Foust</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-167711</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Foust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/#comment-167711</guid>
		<description>Don, my point is that without knowing their methodology, we can&#039;t really say that the study is good or bad. Like you, I have serious doubts about the thing, because it just &lt;i&gt;feels&lt;/i&gt; wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, my point is that without knowing their methodology, we can&#8217;t really say that the study is good or bad. Like you, I have serious doubts about the thing, because it just <i>feels</i> wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisB</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-167468</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/#comment-167468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused. I was expecting a trap...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. I was expecting a trap&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/comment-page-1/#comment-166739</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/03/25/measuring-stability/#comment-166739</guid>
		<description>This study is garbage; they rate highly nations that rely upon others for national defense. The US is downrated due to private arms ownership.

It&#039;s a joke. 

Afganistan v Iraq is missing the forest for the trees with respect to this study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study is garbage; they rate highly nations that rely upon others for national defense. The US is downrated due to private arms ownership.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a joke. </p>
<p>Afganistan v Iraq is missing the forest for the trees with respect to this study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

