<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharia Law Enforced in Texas!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/08/sharia-law-enforced-in-texas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/08/sharia-law-enforced-in-texas/</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelW</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/08/sharia-law-enforced-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-89366</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2439#comment-89366</guid>
		<description>You got it, Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got it, Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synova</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/02/08/sharia-law-enforced-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-88461</link>
		<dc:creator>Synova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2439#comment-88461</guid>
		<description>The Archbishop&#039;s statement was more nuanced and what-not, something about adapting some aspects for whatever value of the word &quot;some&quot; he had in mind.

I would think that the adaptable aspects would be the ones held in common already so which of the contrary aspects did he have in mind?

A contract and arbitration is a different matter so long as the contract and penalties are otherwise legal.    (ie. a contract to force marriage of your daughter when she came of age to some guy she didn&#039;t want wouldn&#039;t fly, regardless.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Archbishop&#8217;s statement was more nuanced and what-not, something about adapting some aspects for whatever value of the word &#8220;some&#8221; he had in mind.</p>
<p>I would think that the adaptable aspects would be the ones held in common already so which of the contrary aspects did he have in mind?</p>
<p>A contract and arbitration is a different matter so long as the contract and penalties are otherwise legal.    (ie. a contract to force marriage of your daughter when she came of age to some guy she didn&#8217;t want wouldn&#8217;t fly, regardless.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

