<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 Stundie Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/22/2007-stundie-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/22/2007-stundie-awards/</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisB</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/22/2007-stundie-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-72522</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2214#comment-72522</guid>
		<description>heh, it&#039;s a real close race thats for sure. I had to go with the air pressure as a source of gravity. So much richer in the context too. The photos of emt&#039;s at the pentagon were obviously faked because the IV bags didn&#039;t have holes in them to let in the gravity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, it&#8217;s a real close race thats for sure. I had to go with the air pressure as a source of gravity. So much richer in the context too. The photos of emt&#8217;s at the pentagon were obviously faked because the IV bags didn&#8217;t have holes in them to let in the gravity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelW</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2008/01/22/2007-stundie-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-72512</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=2214#comment-72512</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s some pretty funny stuff.  In the end, I had to go with the circular logic statement over the see-saw QED.


&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Originally Posted by Craig Ranke CIT&lt;/i&gt;
It&#039;s circular logic to suggest that strong evidence proving there was a serious deception that took place during this operation of deception is null and void because of the physical evidence which the evidence that contradicts it proves is the deception the first place.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s some pretty funny stuff.  In the end, I had to go with the circular logic statement over the see-saw QED.</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Originally Posted by Craig Ranke CIT</i><br />
It&#8217;s circular logic to suggest that strong evidence proving there was a serious deception that took place during this operation of deception is null and void because of the physical evidence which the evidence that contradicts it proves is the deception the first place.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

