<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Levin and the shocking torture memo&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/11/07/levin-and-the-shocking-torture-memos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/11/07/levin-and-the-shocking-torture-memos/</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/11/07/levin-and-the-shocking-torture-memos/comment-page-1/#comment-60939</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=1794#comment-60939</guid>
		<description>That is kind of what I am driving at. On the legal side I think he is pretty sharp here. His shock on this kind of thing is off the reservation. I could have taken it and fisked it, but I didn&#039;t want to obscure the merits of the legal case, and just talked about the general issue I have. However, no reason others can&#039;t take each of these types of statements on one by one. I will disagree with you on the Krugman reference, same issue, but not near as big of one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is kind of what I am driving at. On the legal side I think he is pretty sharp here. His shock on this kind of thing is off the reservation. I could have taken it and fisked it, but I didn&#8217;t want to obscure the merits of the legal case, and just talked about the general issue I have. However, no reason others can&#8217;t take each of these types of statements on one by one. I will disagree with you on the Krugman reference, same issue, but not near as big of one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelW</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/11/07/levin-and-the-shocking-torture-memos/comment-page-1/#comment-60938</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=1794#comment-60938</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/11/how-low-can-they-go.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lederman&lt;/a&gt; on why he had not spoken up before now:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I responded that I really have nothing to add -- The story speaks for itself, and any commentary ought to be superfluous. Moreover, at this point, what difference does it make? The Democrats will assent to &lt;strong&gt;our new American torture regime&lt;/strong&gt; no matter how grotesque and outrageous the story gets, no matter to what degree the Department of Justice&#039;s integrity and independence were compromised.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It is exactly this kind of hyperbole that makes it terribly difficult to chart a rational course with respect to things like waterboarding.  I genuinely enjoy much of Lederman&#039;s analysis on legal matters, but much like Paul Krugman, when politics enters the picture all rationality goes out the window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/11/how-low-can-they-go.html" rel="nofollow">Lederman</a> on why he had not spoken up before now:</p>
<blockquote><p>I responded that I really have nothing to add &#8212; The story speaks for itself, and any commentary ought to be superfluous. Moreover, at this point, what difference does it make? The Democrats will assent to <strong>our new American torture regime</strong> no matter how grotesque and outrageous the story gets, no matter to what degree the Department of Justice&#8217;s integrity and independence were compromised.</p></blockquote>
<p>It is exactly this kind of hyperbole that makes it terribly difficult to chart a rational course with respect to things like waterboarding.  I genuinely enjoy much of Lederman&#8217;s analysis on legal matters, but much like Paul Krugman, when politics enters the picture all rationality goes out the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

