If so, O’Reilly let me make the point. I basically ridicule two people here at this blog. Greenwald and his little friend. Given that two more poisonous pens hardly exist in the blogosphere, with some of the most vicious and misleading smears that I can imagine coming from them, I have no concern for their feelings. I may be belittling them, but all my snark is based on actual things they have said, with no points being misrepresented, nothing taken out of context, and the jabs have bite because they are true. That is a courtesy they refuse to extend to the victims of their mendacious screeds. Beneath my scorn are serious points about how they conduct themselves. If complaints about lying and smearing others are mere piffle to you so be it.

Perhaps another sock-puppet or mini-me seeking approval from glenn the grandmaster himself?

Their devotion is scary, mostly because they can’t admit their devotion.

What are you talking about?

(1) When leaving condescendingly snide comments, always try to do so on the proper post.

(2) When quoting someone, it does not hurt to both quote and link; take extra care to link an actual quote instead of one you made up.

(3) Make some sense. Although it seems a daunting task, it really is within you powers.

(4) When in doubt about 1, 2, or 3, consider that a good time to leave the internets.

So my beef is with a stylistic approach to argument, not with the argument itself.

Why the argument that criticizes and belittles the author? Substanceless piffle from rightwingers.

With friends like O’Reilly, Limbaugh and Malkin who needs Lance and Keith_Indy?