<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curse of the Monica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/05/29/curse-of-the-monica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/05/29/curse-of-the-monica/</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/05/29/curse-of-the-monica/comment-page-1/#comment-59397</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=1139#comment-59397</guid>
		<description>Great stuff Michael. 


&lt;blockquote&gt;
either your commenters flame you, or they ignore you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would put it more in the category of, &quot;what else do you say?&quot; If you are a Bush supporter, or a relative defender such as me (as in relative to you, glasnost) Michael has the administration cold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Michael. </p>
<blockquote><p>
either your commenters flame you, or they ignore you.</p></blockquote>
<p>I would put it more in the category of, &#8220;what else do you say?&#8221; If you are a Bush supporter, or a relative defender such as me (as in relative to you, glasnost) Michael has the administration cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glasnost</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/05/29/curse-of-the-monica/comment-page-1/#comment-59393</link>
		<dc:creator>glasnost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=1139#comment-59393</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still coasting by on my &#039;frequent commenter&#039; reputation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still coasting by on my &#8216;frequent commenter&#8217; reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glasnost</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/05/29/curse-of-the-monica/comment-page-1/#comment-59392</link>
		<dc:creator>glasnost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 23:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=1139#comment-59392</guid>
		<description>Wow.

Well, congradulations on very precise and detailed reporting.

I should be more effusively appreciative here, but all I can say is, it&#039;s too bad no one else commented. I see that on blogs of all persuasions - when you usually take policy A (Bush is innocent/Bush is guilty), and then one day you take policy B (the reverse), either your commenters flame you, or they ignore you.

This is right up there with the wiretapping, in the class of, &quot;legal violations that will never be punished.&quot; Although the chances are better for this one that some of the flunkies will be brought to justice. Because we know there names, and because there&#039;s no national-security exception to hide behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
<p>Well, congradulations on very precise and detailed reporting.</p>
<p>I should be more effusively appreciative here, but all I can say is, it&#8217;s too bad no one else commented. I see that on blogs of all persuasions &#8211; when you usually take policy A (Bush is innocent/Bush is guilty), and then one day you take policy B (the reverse), either your commenters flame you, or they ignore you.</p>
<p>This is right up there with the wiretapping, in the class of, &#8220;legal violations that will never be punished.&#8221; Although the chances are better for this one that some of the flunkies will be brought to justice. Because we know there names, and because there&#8217;s no national-security exception to hide behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

