<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Brief, Do The Whirlwind Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/04/26/news-brief-do-the-whirlwind-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/04/26/news-brief-do-the-whirlwind-edition/</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:30:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogosphere news roundup, continued &#171; Help Mark Seidenfeld and Boycott Ducat</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/04/26/news-brief-do-the-whirlwind-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-45538</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogosphere news roundup, continued &#171; Help Mark Seidenfeld and Boycott Ducat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=934#comment-45538</guid>
		<description>[...] brief is a daily roundup that is featured at the Conjecturor and at A Second Hand Conjecture, a related blog to which Joshua Foust and others contribute.Â  Global Voices Online featured a link to the April [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brief is a daily roundup that is featured at the Conjecturor and at A Second Hand Conjecture, a related blog to which Joshua Foust and others contribute.Â  Global Voices Online featured a link to the April [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/04/26/news-brief-do-the-whirlwind-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-41346</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=934#comment-41346</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A bipartisan panel has also recommended some much needed contracting reform. Finally!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Keep bashing away. I love it. This stuff, especially cost plus contracting, has been a constant source of frustration for me. I knew I would like having you here.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The poorest 5 billion people of the world represent a huge opportunity for business. It is high time we develop it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Which means you will help me promote &quot;The Ultimate Resource&quot; next week?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Azar Nafisi, whose book Reading Lolita in Tehran is one of my favorite memoirs, sees her homeland as deep in crisis. Assuming sheâ€™s right, we have little to fear from Tehranâ€”its people appreciate both their newfound respect, their lack of basic dignities, and their independence. Direct intervention by Washington could upset this delicate balance that is slowly tipping the country toward eventual reform.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Great book, and I agree with her. I also think direct intervention should be avoided (though I am willing to take them on at the borders of Iraq.) I am not so sure we have nothing to fear. Hope you are right, but the realists have a point about propping up authoritarian regimes. Unstable regimes can act in unpredictable manners, and what comes next might be even worse. That being said, I hope they fall to internal pressure anyway. I am just not so sure it won&#039;t lead to some crisis along the way. I keep my fingers crossed.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Whatâ€™s worse, the federal agencies, themselves rather opaque to most forms of audit, canâ€™t be bothered to even make sure the people they hand metrochecks out to work for them. Your tax dollars at work.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I hate to be a pain in the butt (not true, but it is polite to say so) but doesn&#039;t that make my point about the military in the discussion we were having yesterday as just a big bureaucracy, no more no less?

Once more fascinating stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A bipartisan panel has also recommended some much needed contracting reform. Finally!</p></blockquote>
<p>Keep bashing away. I love it. This stuff, especially cost plus contracting, has been a constant source of frustration for me. I knew I would like having you here.</p>
<blockquote><p>The poorest 5 billion people of the world represent a huge opportunity for business. It is high time we develop it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Which means you will help me promote &#8220;The Ultimate Resource&#8221; next week?</p>
<blockquote><p>Azar Nafisi, whose book Reading Lolita in Tehran is one of my favorite memoirs, sees her homeland as deep in crisis. Assuming sheâ€™s right, we have little to fear from Tehranâ€”its people appreciate both their newfound respect, their lack of basic dignities, and their independence. Direct intervention by Washington could upset this delicate balance that is slowly tipping the country toward eventual reform.</p></blockquote>
<p>Great book, and I agree with her. I also think direct intervention should be avoided (though I am willing to take them on at the borders of Iraq.) I am not so sure we have nothing to fear. Hope you are right, but the realists have a point about propping up authoritarian regimes. Unstable regimes can act in unpredictable manners, and what comes next might be even worse. That being said, I hope they fall to internal pressure anyway. I am just not so sure it won&#8217;t lead to some crisis along the way. I keep my fingers crossed.</p>
<blockquote><p>Whatâ€™s worse, the federal agencies, themselves rather opaque to most forms of audit, canâ€™t be bothered to even make sure the people they hand metrochecks out to work for them. Your tax dollars at work.</p></blockquote>
<p>I hate to be a pain in the butt (not true, but it is polite to say so) but doesn&#8217;t that make my point about the military in the discussion we were having yesterday as just a big bureaucracy, no more no less?</p>
<p>Once more fascinating stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tajikistan - &#187; News Brief, Do The Whirlwind Edition</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2007/04/26/news-brief-do-the-whirlwind-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-41308</link>
		<dc:creator>tajikistan - &#187; News Brief, Do The Whirlwind Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=934#comment-41308</guid>
		<description>[...] News Brief, Do The Whirlwind Edition News Brief, Do The Whirlwind Edition Posted by Joshua Foust on Apr 26 2007 &#124; Tagged as: Foreign affairs, Environment, History, Developmental economics, social science, Military Matters Cross-posted at The Conjecturer. The Pentagon DARPA wants American snipers to have fool proof sniper scopes that are accurate out to 2000 meters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News Brief, Do The Whirlwind Edition News Brief, Do The Whirlwind Edition Posted by Joshua Foust on Apr 26 2007 | Tagged as: Foreign affairs, Environment, History, Developmental economics, social science, Military Matters Cross-posted at The Conjecturer. The Pentagon DARPA wants American snipers to have fool proof sniper scopes that are accurate out to 2000 meters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
