Da’ end of Demint’s Patience?– Updated with Video

Back in January pressure from blogs finally drove congress to do something about earmark reform. Despite all the bleating from some quarters, as expected it was the Republicans who were most responsible for pushing through the Demint amendment, the Democrats dragged their feet before capitulating in the face of blogosphere wide pressure.

Now we find out that the Democrats refuse to implement it. So DeMint has sent a letter to the Senate leaders Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell (pdf.) announcing he will seek “unanimous consent to enact” the rule which is being blocked.

S. Res. 123 requires disclosure of several types of information related to earmarks contained in committee-passed bills, which must be made available in a searchable format on the Internet. This includes the name of the senator requesting the earmark, the name and address of the intended recipient of the earmark, the purpose of the earmark, and a certification that the requesting senator and his or her spouse have no financial interest in the requested earmark. This is simple information that every senator should be willing to provide the public.

[...]

For example, the Fiscal Year 2008 earmark solicitation form circulated by the Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development did not require the disclosure of the name or address of the intended earmark recipient, nor did it require certification that the requesting senator has no financial interest in the earmark. The earmark solicitation forms circulated by the Appropriations Subcommittees on Interior
and Agriculture also failed to require the disclosure of these items, and the only requirement of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education was that earmark requests be submitted on time. These events clearly demonstrate that it’s time for the Senate to stop dragging its feet on this critical issue.

Let me be clear, it isn’t Senator McConnell’s office which is the problem here. I got this letter from Senator McConnell’s office. I have covered this issue and who is really dragging their feet on reform here and here. More links in those posts if you want to really dig into it.

Of course, as covered earlier, with people such as Representative David Obey in charge:

Now this is jaw-dropping. Congressman Jeff Flake is contending, as the following video will show, that the House is violating its own rules on earmarks. As an example, Flake points to one earmark in the war supplemental bill that is designated for NASA. Because it wasn’t reported in the bill correctly, Flake was seeking clarification. In response, Congressman David Obey said:

“The fact is, that an earmark is something that is requested by an individual member. This item was not requested by any individual member. It was put in the bill by ME!”

Either Obey believes he is above the law when it comes to enforcing House rules, or he doesn’t believe he is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. Which is it?

You can see the problem we are confronting. Click through for more and video of his complaint.

If the blogosphere was serious about reform, then it is time to hold our lawmakers feet to the fire.

Update: Brad Warbiany is on this as well. Red Generation has a bunch more on this including a huge collection of links from the media.

Here is Senator Demint on the Senate floor:

[youtube 5Hl4mFNdf6k]

Tags: , , , , , ,

About Lance

I want to thank everybody who has encouraged me over the past few years to do this. I doubt it will hold but a few people's interest, but that is okay with me. Special thanks go to Peter over at http://www.liberalcapitalist.com. I value my privacy a great deal, so I will guess you will have to get to know me over time to find out much. I am in the financial services, wealth management, investing or whatever you want to call it business. I have children, my oldest is entering college. I have no great or imposing academic background, my grades varied from high enough to get invited to an honors program at my university to frustrating enough to cause my father great grief. My major was history, with a minor in ethics. My main interest towards the end was in the history of economic ideas before life took a turn and I ended up never going on to graduate school. However, I have a fair knowledge of history, economics, investing and would probably be considered well read. My tastes are eclectic and I pretty much find the entire world interesting. I have an enduring interest in how people learn about and analyze the world; my posts here will examine this topic in detail over time. I make no claims to be above the very biases and errors I see in others, in fact it is my belief that we are incapable of escaping them, only moderating their control over us. I am a member of no political party, but I would broadly consider myself a man of the right. I am inclined to free market economics, limited government and a fairly narrow view of the role of the state. A small L libertarian if you will. However, if you are looking for broad based "the left believes..." or "wingers are so...." types of attacks on liberals, conservatives, neo-cons or whatever enemy you want to slam, look elsewhere. Lance
This entry was posted in Domestic Politics, Lance's Page. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Da’ end of Demint’s Patience?– Updated with Video

  1. bains says:

    Ummm, you might want to modify your post Lance…Dave Obey is in the other house. 

  2. ChrisB says:

    Heh, Lance has a history of this bains.

  3. Lance says:

    bains and Chris,

    Doh!! Just a typo as opposed to brain failure this time though.

    Fixed. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>