<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Libertarians pull a Lamont?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/</link>
	<description>Questions through the veil of ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:33:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; Bob Smither Debate</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; Bob Smither Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-908</guid>
		<description>[...] Libertarian candidate Bob Smither, vying for the U.S. Representative seat recently vacated by Tom DeLay, debated his two major opponents a couple of days ago (h/t Austin Cassidy): TEXAS CITY â€” For a first-time event, the Texas City-La Marque Chamber of Commerceâ€™s issues forum Tuesday achieved something no other area political meeting had this year. All three of the major candidates for the 22nd congressional district came to debate the issues. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Libertarian candidate Bob Smither, vying for the U.S. Representative seat recently vacated by Tom DeLay, debated his two major opponents a couple of days ago (h/t Austin Cassidy): TEXAS CITY â€” For a first-time event, the Texas City-La Marque Chamber of Commerceâ€™s issues forum Tuesday achieved something no other area political meeting had this year. All three of the major candidates for the 22nd congressional district came to debate the issues. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; Henke the Kingmaker?</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; Henke the Kingmaker?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-868</guid>
		<description>[...] Captain Ed and Xrlq are suggesting that the Allen campaign, which is looking for a blogger, consider hiring Jon Henke. Somehow I don&#8217;t see Jon as interested, but power to him if he wants to cash in. However, if that isn&#8217;t what Jon wants to do, even though it probably wouldn&#8217;t pay as much, how about helping Smithers? It helps with accomplishing gridlock while putting a small government type in office. How about it Jon? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Captain Ed and Xrlq are suggesting that the Allen campaign, which is looking for a blogger, consider hiring Jon Henke. Somehow I don&#8217;t see Jon as interested, but power to him if he wants to cash in. However, if that isn&#8217;t what Jon wants to do, even though it probably wouldn&#8217;t pay as much, how about helping Smithers? It helps with accomplishing gridlock while putting a small government type in office. How about it Jon? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Pogue,

I knew you would come through with some links.

Donating money! How old fashioned. Still I agree. However, I think in order for Smithers to have a chance it can&#039;t just depend on recruiting libertarians, who are likely to campaign rather poorly, a long time problem plaguing the party. We need to get Republicans on board as well. Most Democrats (unless they are voting Republican due to the war) are unlikely to pass up the chance to elect one of their own. So we have to get a good portion of the disaffected Republican small government base on board.

Matt,

It is good to see you here. I can&#039;t say I would vote communist, but I understand where you are coming from. Still, when the outcome is likely to be a Democrat otherwise, thus making the foreign policy argument moot, wouldn&#039;t it make sense to help move the Congress, and the Republicans most critically, towards smaller government? 

Chris,

Thanks for stopping by and for the link. I&#039;ll take what we have gathered and do a new post with it all in one place. 

Finally I am looking for some ideas and resources on how to help the campaign in a systematic way. The left wing net roots made a real impact in CT. What did they do that we might copy? I don&#039;t mean the dishonest rhetoric or ridiculous race baiting and name calling, but actual grass roots things that those of us who squeeze a mouse can accomplish. I watched the ugly (though very amusing) spectacle from afar, so in practical terms I am not sure what they actually did besides jabber away on the internet. I assume it was focused well thought out jabber at minimum. I would like to see people blogging about this, send me trackbacks and I&#039;ll aggregate them. Let us see if the hive can work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pogue,</p>
<p>I knew you would come through with some links.</p>
<p>Donating money! How old fashioned. Still I agree. However, I think in order for Smithers to have a chance it can&#8217;t just depend on recruiting libertarians, who are likely to campaign rather poorly, a long time problem plaguing the party. We need to get Republicans on board as well. Most Democrats (unless they are voting Republican due to the war) are unlikely to pass up the chance to elect one of their own. So we have to get a good portion of the disaffected Republican small government base on board.</p>
<p>Matt,</p>
<p>It is good to see you here. I can&#8217;t say I would vote communist, but I understand where you are coming from. Still, when the outcome is likely to be a Democrat otherwise, thus making the foreign policy argument moot, wouldn&#8217;t it make sense to help move the Congress, and the Republicans most critically, towards smaller government? </p>
<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by and for the link. I&#8217;ll take what we have gathered and do a new post with it all in one place. </p>
<p>Finally I am looking for some ideas and resources on how to help the campaign in a systematic way. The left wing net roots made a real impact in CT. What did they do that we might copy? I don&#8217;t mean the dishonest rhetoric or ridiculous race baiting and name calling, but actual grass roots things that those of us who squeeze a mouse can accomplish. I watched the ugly (though very amusing) spectacle from afar, so in practical terms I am not sure what they actually did besides jabber away on the internet. I assume it was focused well thought out jabber at minimum. I would like to see people blogging about this, send me trackbacks and I&#8217;ll aggregate them. Let us see if the hive can work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PogueMahone</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>PogueMahone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Contacting the whoâ€™s who in the 22nd district is not a bad idea.  As with most places, the powers that be and the deep pocket contributors are often the same people.

Here is the link for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FECâ€™s list&lt;/a&gt; of contributors to the Fort Bend County Republicans.  It seems to me that around here the most influential people are the attorneys (of course), engineering firms, and builders.  They seem to be pulling most of the strings around here.
If one were so inclined, one could make a list of addresses and emails(if possible).

However, I believe that the best way to elect a libertarian here is to contribute to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://fortbendlp.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;local LP chapter.&lt;/a&gt;  I know itâ€™s not a very exciting thing to do, but it seems that they would have the best resources and enlist motivated personnel to spread the message.
If you were to look at the money raised by Smither as of June 30, 2006 (a paltry $2,486) it is hard to imagine Smither having the capability of getting his message out.  

There has been a lot of p*ssing and moaning lately about what is and who are the real libertarians in the libertarianâ€™s corner of the blogoshpere.  I can tell who wonâ€™t be a libertarian â€“ the next congressman representing the people of Texas 22nd district.  That is of course if Smither canâ€™t get recognized.  

Bloggerâ€™s can take a breather from squeezing their mouse and write a check.

It doesnâ€™t have to be much.  Even pocket change will helpâ€¦ just look again at the money heâ€™s raised.  Imagine.  For betting even only ten bucks, our dividends â€“ if we win â€“ will pay in spades.

And that concludes the best sales pitch Iâ€™ve ever undertaken.  Which might explain why Iâ€™m not a salesman.  :)

Other interesting reading on the subject:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smither4congress.com/index.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Smitherâ€™s campaign website.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smither.net/BB/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Smitherâ€™s blog.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fortbendnow.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FortBendNow&lt;/a&gt; â€“ a local online publication.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contacting the whoâ€™s who in the 22nd district is not a bad idea.  As with most places, the powers that be and the deep pocket contributors are often the same people.</p>
<p>Here is the link for the <a href="http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/" rel="nofollow">FECâ€™s list</a> of contributors to the Fort Bend County Republicans.  It seems to me that around here the most influential people are the attorneys (of course), engineering firms, and builders.  They seem to be pulling most of the strings around here.<br />
If one were so inclined, one could make a list of addresses and emails(if possible).</p>
<p>However, I believe that the best way to elect a libertarian here is to contribute to the <a href="http://fortbendlp.org/" rel="nofollow">local LP chapter.</a>  I know itâ€™s not a very exciting thing to do, but it seems that they would have the best resources and enlist motivated personnel to spread the message.<br />
If you were to look at the money raised by Smither as of June 30, 2006 (a paltry $2,486) it is hard to imagine Smither having the capability of getting his message out.  </p>
<p>There has been a lot of p*ssing and moaning lately about what is and who are the real libertarians in the libertarianâ€™s corner of the blogoshpere.  I can tell who wonâ€™t be a libertarian â€“ the next congressman representing the people of Texas 22nd district.  That is of course if Smither canâ€™t get recognized.  </p>
<p>Bloggerâ€™s can take a breather from squeezing their mouse and write a check.</p>
<p>It doesnâ€™t have to be much.  Even pocket change will helpâ€¦ just look again at the money heâ€™s raised.  Imagine.  For betting even only ten bucks, our dividends â€“ if we win â€“ will pay in spades.</p>
<p>And that concludes the best sales pitch Iâ€™ve ever undertaken.  Which might explain why Iâ€™m not a salesman.  <img src='http://asecondhandconjecture.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Other interesting reading on the subject:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smither4congress.com/index.php" rel="nofollow">Smitherâ€™s campaign website.</a><br />
<a href="http://www.smither.net/BB/" rel="nofollow">Smitherâ€™s blog.</a><br />
<a href="http://www.fortbendnow.com/" rel="nofollow">FortBendNow</a> â€“ a local online publication.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Really quickly, I found this email address for 
Gary Gillen, the Fort Bend republican party chair:
gary@garygillen.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really quickly, I found this email address for<br />
Gary Gillen, the Fort Bend republican party chair:<br />
<a href="mailto:gary@garygillen.com">gary@garygillen.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-552</guid>
		<description>I would vote for a communist who wanted to fight the Islamic fascists.

BTW I was scty/treas of our local Libertarian club for 3 years.

I vote mostly Republican these days except for theocons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would vote for a communist who wanted to fight the Islamic fascists.</p>
<p>BTW I was scty/treas of our local Libertarian club for 3 years.</p>
<p>I vote mostly Republican these days except for theocons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertydoc</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertydoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Yes,

We should definitely support Smithers.  It is about time that the Republicans had their feet put to the fire.  The way to do that is to make them consider libertarians, so that they will actually live up to some of their small government rhetoric.  Don&#039;t worry about Smither&#039;s foreign policy position.  It&#039;s not like this one freshman congressman would have any real effect on foreign policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes,</p>
<p>We should definitely support Smithers.  It is about time that the Republicans had their feet put to the fire.  The way to do that is to make them consider libertarians, so that they will actually live up to some of their small government rhetoric.  Don&#8217;t worry about Smither&#8217;s foreign policy position.  It&#8217;s not like this one freshman congressman would have any real effect on foreign policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hammer of Truth &#187; Smither Gets Blogged</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Hammer of Truth &#187; Smither Gets Blogged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-550</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Should Libertarians pull a Lamont?&#8221; on A Second Hand Conjecture [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Should Libertarians pull a Lamont?&#8221; on A Second Hand Conjecture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PongGod</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>PongGod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-546</guid>
		<description>I also live in the district and will be voting for Smither.  A Republican write-in effort has no chance whatsoever under the current circumstances.  Being a third party candidate with limited funding and little name recognition certainly makes Smither a longshot, but given that this is a solidly conservative district, the &quot;Goldwater Republican&quot; image he&#039;s trying to fashion for himself could sell well with Republicans who absolutely don&#039;t want Nick Lampson to be elected.

As for the Fair Tax, I think Smither&#039;s support for it could be described as, &quot;the current system is awful and this is the best alternative I&#039;ve seen yet.&quot;  Personally, I find it too flawed to support; I can&#039;t support any proposal unless I think it is highly probable to be better than what we currently have and I can see many reasons why it may not be.  For a detailed and scathing critique of the Fair Tax, check this out:  http://www.mises.org/story/1814</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also live in the district and will be voting for Smither.  A Republican write-in effort has no chance whatsoever under the current circumstances.  Being a third party candidate with limited funding and little name recognition certainly makes Smither a longshot, but given that this is a solidly conservative district, the &#8220;Goldwater Republican&#8221; image he&#8217;s trying to fashion for himself could sell well with Republicans who absolutely don&#8217;t want Nick Lampson to be elected.</p>
<p>As for the Fair Tax, I think Smither&#8217;s support for it could be described as, &#8220;the current system is awful and this is the best alternative I&#8217;ve seen yet.&#8221;  Personally, I find it too flawed to support; I can&#8217;t support any proposal unless I think it is highly probable to be better than what we currently have and I can see many reasons why it may not be.  For a detailed and scathing critique of the Fair Tax, check this out:  <a href="http://www.mises.org/story/1814" rel="nofollow">http://www.mises.org/story/1814</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Yes, to Michael. Sorry. 

Really, read the book.  The Fair Tax isn&#039;t about poltical persuasion...it&#039;s about the people controlling the flow of money to the government.

It&#039;s a libertarian&#039;s wet dream (assuming that taxes are an unavoidable reality).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, to Michael. Sorry. </p>
<p>Really, read the book.  The Fair Tax isn&#8217;t about poltical persuasion&#8230;it&#8217;s about the people controlling the flow of money to the government.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a libertarian&#8217;s wet dream (assuming that taxes are an unavoidable reality).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-533</guid>
		<description>I assume Billy&#039;s comment was directed at you Michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume Billy&#8217;s comment was directed at you Michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-532</guid>
		<description>The best thing to do is buy the Fair Tax book.

The rate suggested is based on the number of people who currently pay taxes and the current tax bill (current at the time of writing).

The tax burden should substantially decrease as you include those US citizens who do not pay taxes (for whatever reasons) as well as illegals and tourists.

Further, only new items will be taxed.  You can control your tax burden by purchasing used cars, used houses, etc.

I don&#039;t know about you, but calculating all the taxes I pay in a year, it is substantially more than what is suggested as a starting place in the Fair Tax book (23% I believe).  When you start adding state/fed payroll tax, sales tax, property tax, ad valorem tax, gas tax, tobacco tax, alcohol tax, death tax (where applicable), luxury taxes (where applicable), the cost hire an accountant to help you pay our tax, etc., etc., the numbers really add up.  

Bottom line, the government is stealing our money by force and we can do nothing about it.  With the fair tax, you can, in the least, vote with your wallet.  Spend when you are pleased with the government&#039;s actions and withhold when you&#039;ve had enough.

My problem with drug dealers, pimps, hookers, illegals, etc., is that they pay no taxes.  Start paying into the system, brother, and stop living off of my dollar for your housing, food and medical care.  If you want the lifestyle ou live, fine - pay your share.  Your tax dollars can go with mine to the emergency rooms who treat the vicitms of your trade.  Why should I have to subsidize your mess alone?  

Mostly, I feel that the Fair Tax is the first step in the direction of limited government, government controlled by the people.  He who controls the money controls the power.

We are inching closer to snatching that power from the government.  Let us not hem hand haw over % points.  We&#039;ll only be taxed to death if we allow ourselves to be taxed to death.  Once Americans begin to realize what their government costs them, they&#039;ll cut back.  Problem now is, no one knows whet they pay.  ASk around,  Ask people what they paid in Federal Income taxes last year.  I bet most people will respond by saying they paid nothing, they got a refund.  That&#039;s the problem.

From there we open up the public school system to the free market (as colleges and universities are) and we end this blood letting of money to solve a problem that keeps getting worse.  And then, maybe, we can get a decent education to the poor white rural kids and the poor black urban kids and we can point this country back in a direction where people are judged by their character and not by their identity group.

But then again, I&#039;m just an anti-establishment, indivdualist crank.

^billy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best thing to do is buy the Fair Tax book.</p>
<p>The rate suggested is based on the number of people who currently pay taxes and the current tax bill (current at the time of writing).</p>
<p>The tax burden should substantially decrease as you include those US citizens who do not pay taxes (for whatever reasons) as well as illegals and tourists.</p>
<p>Further, only new items will be taxed.  You can control your tax burden by purchasing used cars, used houses, etc.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but calculating all the taxes I pay in a year, it is substantially more than what is suggested as a starting place in the Fair Tax book (23% I believe).  When you start adding state/fed payroll tax, sales tax, property tax, ad valorem tax, gas tax, tobacco tax, alcohol tax, death tax (where applicable), luxury taxes (where applicable), the cost hire an accountant to help you pay our tax, etc., etc., the numbers really add up.  </p>
<p>Bottom line, the government is stealing our money by force and we can do nothing about it.  With the fair tax, you can, in the least, vote with your wallet.  Spend when you are pleased with the government&#8217;s actions and withhold when you&#8217;ve had enough.</p>
<p>My problem with drug dealers, pimps, hookers, illegals, etc., is that they pay no taxes.  Start paying into the system, brother, and stop living off of my dollar for your housing, food and medical care.  If you want the lifestyle ou live, fine &#8211; pay your share.  Your tax dollars can go with mine to the emergency rooms who treat the vicitms of your trade.  Why should I have to subsidize your mess alone?  </p>
<p>Mostly, I feel that the Fair Tax is the first step in the direction of limited government, government controlled by the people.  He who controls the money controls the power.</p>
<p>We are inching closer to snatching that power from the government.  Let us not hem hand haw over % points.  We&#8217;ll only be taxed to death if we allow ourselves to be taxed to death.  Once Americans begin to realize what their government costs them, they&#8217;ll cut back.  Problem now is, no one knows whet they pay.  ASk around,  Ask people what they paid in Federal Income taxes last year.  I bet most people will respond by saying they paid nothing, they got a refund.  That&#8217;s the problem.</p>
<p>From there we open up the public school system to the free market (as colleges and universities are) and we end this blood letting of money to solve a problem that keeps getting worse.  And then, maybe, we can get a decent education to the poor white rural kids and the poor black urban kids and we can point this country back in a direction where people are judged by their character and not by their identity group.</p>
<p>But then again, I&#8217;m just an anti-establishment, indivdualist crank.</p>
<p>^billy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Pogue says money, that is a start. Over at Chris&#039;s post at Inactivist someone suggested:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I think the best way to get some quick traction on this is to post the details of the republican powers that be in that district so that we can all urge them to officially support him and abandon the write in idea.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hmmm.... I think Pogue should get that together for us. We can post it on various sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pogue says money, that is a start. Over at Chris&#8217;s post at Inactivist someone suggested:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think the best way to get some quick traction on this is to post the details of the republican powers that be in that district so that we can all urge them to officially support him and abandon the write in idea.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;. I think Pogue should get that together for us. We can post it on various sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PogueMahone</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>PogueMahone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Iâ€™m totally stoked about this.

I live in the district.  I will be voting for Smither.  It looks like, however, that Lampson will take it, all the chatter around my parts suggest this and conservatives are disenchanted - so turnout is king.  But if the damned Republicans would just step aside with their idiotic write-in candidates that nobodyâ€™s ever heard of and endorse Smither, the Libertarians have a shot.
I have my reservations.  The conservatives around here are extremely socially conservative.  A recent State ConAmend banning Gay marriage passed with the Fort Bend County vote being in the neighborhood of 90%.

Here is the link for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://fortbendlp.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fort Bend County Libertarians&lt;/a&gt;.  Give money, I will.

Cheers.
And God speed to Bob Smither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™m totally stoked about this.</p>
<p>I live in the district.  I will be voting for Smither.  It looks like, however, that Lampson will take it, all the chatter around my parts suggest this and conservatives are disenchanted &#8211; so turnout is king.  But if the damned Republicans would just step aside with their idiotic write-in candidates that nobodyâ€™s ever heard of and endorse Smither, the Libertarians have a shot.<br />
I have my reservations.  The conservatives around here are extremely socially conservative.  A recent State ConAmend banning Gay marriage passed with the Fort Bend County vote being in the neighborhood of 90%.</p>
<p>Here is the link for the <a href="http://fortbendlp.org/" rel="nofollow">Fort Bend County Libertarians</a>.  Give money, I will.</p>
<p>Cheers.<br />
And God speed to Bob Smither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-520</guid>
		<description>I am not sure. You can go to QandO and search. You&#039;ll find a whole lot on it from Dale. He thinks it won&#039;t work unless it is at a substantially lower rate than is now proposed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure. You can go to QandO and search. You&#8217;ll find a whole lot on it from Dale. He thinks it won&#8217;t work unless it is at a substantially lower rate than is now proposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelW</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-519</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure about the Fair Tax plan.  I&#039;m not sure that I understand it entirely, but it does not seem capable of working very well, if at all.

Do you have any thoughts on that, Lance?  Is it financially feasible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about the Fair Tax plan.  I&#8217;m not sure that I understand it entirely, but it does not seem capable of working very well, if at all.</p>
<p>Do you have any thoughts on that, Lance?  Is it financially feasible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Jackson</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Lance, Reynolds just linked you.

yours/
peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Lance, Reynolds just linked you.</p>
<p>yours/<br />
peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Poet Omar</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>The Poet Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-517</guid>
		<description>Yep, a Ron Paul clone would definitely not be a bad thing (even though I&#039;m not in 100% agreement with the distinguished gentleman from Texas).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, a Ron Paul clone would definitely not be a bad thing (even though I&#8217;m not in 100% agreement with the distinguished gentleman from Texas).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelW</title>
		<link>http://asecondhandconjecture.com/index.php/2006/08/17/should-libertarians-pull-a-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=63#comment-513</guid>
		<description>After reviewing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smither4congress.com/index.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;his campaign website&lt;/a&gt;, he does seem more grounded than most LP candidates.  However, he provides information of a small number of views and conspicuously absent is any mention of national defense (with the exception of a vague swipe at the Patiot Act).

He might be worth backing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reviewing <a href="http://www.smither4congress.com/index.php" rel="nofollow">his campaign website</a>, he does seem more grounded than most LP candidates.  However, he provides information of a small number of views and conspicuously absent is any mention of national defense (with the exception of a vague swipe at the Patiot Act).</p>
<p>He might be worth backing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
